Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.



While  how to protect yourself from emf  sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.

However,  how to reduce emf in your home  found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed.  how to protect from 5g  do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.